tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16688455.post7654484143637691649..comments2024-03-18T09:13:19.346+00:00Comments on panGloss: More on 3 Strikes & Phorm: the ISP Strikes Back, but still true to Phormpanglosshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00900934369744270540noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16688455.post-19988784975342306782008-04-12T14:41:00.000+01:002008-04-12T14:41:00.000+01:00I was talking about hosting liability - as users m...I was talking about hosting liability - as users may be storing infringing tracks on ISP store space. Re ISPs acting as mere conduits for transmission of infringing tracks, you are of course right.panglosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00900934369744270540noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16688455.post-36647657721182302262008-04-12T10:21:00.000+01:002008-04-12T10:21:00.000+01:00I hate to correct, but surely file sharing stuff i...I hate to correct, but surely file sharing stuff is covered under Article 12 of the ECD, not Article 14? And, as a result, "unless they are shown to have actual or constructive knowledge of it" doesn't apply - even with actual knowledge, there's no liability for material being transmitted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com